Whenever anything happens in America, you can be sure that lawsuits will be filed but quick. And so it is in the case of the recent school shooting in Connecticut. According to a story by the news organization Reuters published on Friday, December 28th, only two weeks after the event it was announced that the parents of one of the students who survived the shooting have filed a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut.
The lawsuit claims that the unnamed child suffered, “…emotional and psychological trauma and injury, the nature and extent of which are yet to be determined.”
Soooo…they’re not really sure that their child actually suffered any permanent damage…but she must have! And in any case, they’re suing!
Well, sure, why not file a lawsuit claiming your child has suffered damaged that are not yet apparent? Makes perfect sense. And how much are these parents seeking from the state in damages? Ohhhhhh, only $100 million. Seems like a reasonable amount to me for possible, as yet to be determined damages caused by a horrific event. Perfectly reasonable!
According to the Reuters story Irv Pinsky, the lawyer for the little girl contends that, “…the state Board of Education, Department of Education and Education Commissioner had failed to take appropriate steps to protect children from ‘foreseeable harm.’”
Oh, I see! Every principal of every school should already be anticipating that a lunatic gunman would waltz in and start shooting up the place. Happens all the time! The fact that the (deceased) principal of the Newtown school didn’t is negligent! Negligent to the tune of $100 MILLION smackers.
Here in the good, ol’ U.S. of A., whenever anything bad happens, by God SOMEBODY is gonna pay! And thank the Lord we have attorneys like Irv Pinsky to be there to guide the parents of that little girl with the as-yet-to-be-determined damages.
Read the story HERE
3 comments:
I could not agree more and could not have said it better.
Please pardon my bluntness.......(is that a word?) but where is the suit against his mom and her estate for allowing the access to the guns to begin with? Now Ms. Feinstein is proposing I should nhave to submit to the Orwellian Big Brother registration/fingerprinting/photo regime to be a "legal" citizen/gun owner. Not no, but HELL NO!!!!!!
Check your facts people, Feinstein has a concealed permit but wants to restrict you and yours. I do not smell a rat, I smell something terribly worse.
Cass
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/130101/irv-pinsky-conn-lawyer-withdraws-100m-sandy-hook
Irv changed his mind
Post a Comment