Who Am I?
- Bob Barbanes:
- A nobody; a nitwit; a pilot; a motorcyclist; a raconteur; a lover...of life - who loves to laugh, who tries to not take myself (or anything) too seriously...just a normal guy who knows his place in the universe by being in touch with my spiritual side. What more is there?
05 November 2019
Who Sets U.S. Foreign Policy?
So now we know the identity of the infamous whistleblower! (His name is not important. It’s been revealed in plenty of other places online if you’re really curious.) He’s a kid. He’s 33 now, but all of this dates back to when he was in the Obama administration in 2015. So he’s being used, in other words thrown to the wolves by the older, more experienced politicians and those of the so-called “deep state” who want to keep their hands clean…at least as clean as possible given that nobody is going to look good when this is all over.
Apparently, the kid works for the CIA, must’ve been some low-level wonk (“intelligence analyst”) probably recruited right out of college, perhaps dreaming he was going to be the next master spy like the fictional Jack Ryan of Tom Clancy novels. Whatever.
In 2015 the CIA assigned him to the National Security Council (NSC) in the Obama administration working for Susan Rice. He also worked for Vice President Joe Biden on Ukraine policy issues. He was “held over” into the Trump administration and handled the “Ukraine desk” (whatever that is) at the NSC, and was eventually brought into the White House until his anti-Trump sentiments were revealed – which we can surmise made him persona non grata. He has moved back to CIA headquarters…but not before meeting with Senator Adam Schiff (who heads the House Intelligence Committee) and agreeing to become The Whistleblower.
Since this young man only claims to have second-hand knowledge about the phone call President Trump had with Ukraine President Zelensky, it stands to reason that the source of this second-hand information was U.S. Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who actually did listen in on the phone call and who says he had serious misgivings about what President Trump was doing because it…and this is what everybody says…it would jeopardize national security!! That’s the catch-all, right? If you make such a claim, who would…or could…prove you wrong? Who could even question your motives? I think it’s safe to assume that Col. Vindman and our young whistleblower must’ve talked.
But what Lt. Col. Vindman seems to overlook or conveniently forget is that it is THE PRESIDENT who sets our foreign policy…not Congress, not the Joint Chiefs, not the media, and certainly not U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonels, no matter how well-meaning. We don’t have to (and won’t) question Lt. Col. Vindman’s patriotism or character. But we can definitely say that he is off-base here in his testimony. To him I would say “Sir, just let the president handle foreign policy; after all, he is your Commander In Chief.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Honestly I have kind of tuned this whole thing out. I guess I have because there isn't a darn thing I can do about it at this point. The die has been cast. I'm guessing unless they take too long and another election cycle happens, the House will vote to impeach Trump and the Senate will vote to retain him in office. Kind of a Clinton 2.0. All of this is just a drama that must play out to get from point A to B. I definitely am not looking forward to point B.
I agree with you, Ed- I think a lot of Americans are tiring of all this impeachment stuff, mainly because the Democrats haven't really made a case for a heinous impeachable offense. "Violation of the emoluments clause?" That is...to be fair...arguable, hardly cut-and-dried.
Also, I believe that most Americans understand that the Democrats have been trying to find SOMETHING on which to impeach Trump and that this is their (fairly weak) last-ditch effort. It could backfire, big time!
Post a Comment